Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 2241 - 2260 of 6,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2017, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Chatman; and (2) whether the court should grant this certiorari petition, vacate the judgment below and remand this case for further consideration in light of the court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:35 am by Kate Howard
Chatman; and (2) whether the court should grant this certiorari petition, vacate the judgment below and remand this case for further consideration in light of the court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 3:08 pm by Lorene Park
It was also significant that the employer had granted her multiple accommodations. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 10:29 am by Zachary B. Cooper, Attorney at Law, P.C.
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania recently reversed and remanded an appellant’s DUI conviction in light of the Supreme Court’s June 2016 ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 10:29 am by Zachary B. Cooper, Attorney at Law, P.C.
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania recently reversed and remanded an appellant’s DUI conviction in light of the Supreme Court’s June 2016 ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   The Superior Court's decision upheld the trial court’s ruling from the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, which had granted summary judgment in favor of the UM carrier. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
 We expect the Court to issue grants Friday, and those granted cases should make up much of the April argument calendar. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:40 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
For the impact on condo litigation, see our April 5, 2015 blog post entitled Superior housekeeping at Superior Court. #8 – Kamal v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:40 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
For the impact on condo litigation, see our April 5, 2015 blog post entitled Superior housekeeping at Superior Court. #8 – Kamal v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:40 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
For the impact on condo litigation, see our April 5, 2015 blog post entitled Superior housekeeping at Superior Court. #8 – Kamal v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:53 am by Joy Waltemath
On a separate issue, the district court erred in reducing her attorneys’ fee award 20 percent (Wink v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am by Kate Howard
Utah rule, to satisfy the three-year time limitation in Section 13 of the Securities Act with respect to the claims of putative class members (Question granted in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:20 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The probate court's order expressly granted Edward's one-half community interest in the property to "his rightful heirs," and Connie does not dispute that Don and Esther are his rightful heirs. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:20 am by Wolfgang Demino
The probate court's order expressly granted Edward's one-half community interest in the property to "his rightful heirs," and Connie does not dispute that Don and Esther are his rightful heirs. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(G049691; 236 Cal.App.4th 1341; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00593557.) [read post]