Search for: "HALL v. STATE" Results 2241 - 2260 of 3,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm by Andrew Hamm
Todd Gaziano and Reed Hopper for Town Hall preview United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 7:39 am by lawmrh
Hall, Thirty Years of Judicial Retention Elections: An Update, 37 Soc. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am by INFORRM
This confirms and arguably extends the present position under the Data Protection Act 1998 following the “striking down” of section 13(2) by the Court of Appeal in the Vidal Hall case. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 3:54 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In his latest plea to the Justices, he asked that the Court apply to his case a 2014 ruling, in the case of Hall v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am by INFORRM
This confirms and arguably extends the present position under the Data Protection Act 1998 following the “striking down” of section 13(2) by the Court of Appeal in the Vidal Hall case. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am by INFORRM
This confirms and arguably extends the present position under the Data Protection Act 1998 following the “striking down” of section 13(2) by the Court of Appeal in the Vidal Hall case. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Disputing has discussed “manifest disregard” of the law many times since the United States Supreme Court decision in Hall Street Associates, LLC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:03 pm by Thomas Swartz
  The limits of this special exemption was tested yesterday in a case before the Court of Appeals - Matter of Brooklyn Assembly Halls of Jehovah's Witnesses, Inc. v Department of Envtl. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am by Marty Lederman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Hall, Livingston & Newman, JJ.) heard oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division's decision states in this instance neither the Appellant, who had been suspended without pay pending the outcome of the disciplinary proceedings, nor Appellant's attorney, received any notification of the City's determination. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division's decision states in this instance neither the Appellant, who had been suspended without pay pending the outcome of the disciplinary proceedings, nor Appellant's attorney, received any notification of the City's determination. [read post]