Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 5,164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2009, 11:53 am
— United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
* No More (Trade Mark) Trouble With Harry (Winston) Marie-Andrée recounts the melting tale of the Winston family, where Harry built up a worldwide famous jewellery company in 1932 which now tries to prevent his son Bruce from registering his own name and surname as a trade mark for jewellery with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:53 am
But not all reforms are made impossible; moreover, the most effective way to change individual constitutional doctrines is not Article V amendment. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
Simon Harris agreed, pointing his speech in the same direction. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
Lee v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:46 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am
Several justices in previous cases, such as Mitchell v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm
Harris from North Carolina – further reveal, the court simply is not going to permit states to be casual in invoking the VRA to justify race-based districting. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
The district court granted summary judgment in defendants' favor because Kolpacke had failed to show that defendants' had arbitrarily and capriciously applied the terms of the pension plan in calculating Kolpacke's estimated benefits. 08a0191p.06 2008/05/22 Harris v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 8:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 11:10 am
See State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
” Harris v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 10:37 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 pm
In 2008, a divided Supreme Court, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:34 am
Robbins (1997), in which the Court deferred to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulation, or was prohibited by the intervening decision in United States v Mead Corporation (2001). [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Constitution, including most notably the Equal Protection Clause.As noted in Bush v Gore, a state’s determination shall be “conclusive” only if made pursuant to a law “made prior to election day” by which the “state legislature has provided for final determination of contests or controversies . . . . [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:37 pm
This is exactly what occurred in Thompson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:52 pm
" NFP criminal opinions today (10): Harry Paxton v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:30 am
Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002).Good News Club v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:43 am
Simmons-Harris dissent – to “protect[t] the Nation’s social fabric from religious conflict. [read post]
