Search for: "In re J. C."
Results 2241 - 2260
of 4,388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Robertson and David Shea for Plaintiffs and Appellants. 92*92 OPINION YEGAN, J. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Robertson and David Shea for Plaintiffs and Appellants. 92*92 OPINION YEGAN, J. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
This weblog is no exception, having followed the continental infringement saga with a remarkable number of posts [the original UK decision by Arnold J here; Arnold J’s referral to the CJEU here; the CJEU’s ruling here; the Advocate General's ruling in Case C-323/09 here; Interflora II decision here; the 2013 Arnoldian’s decision acknowledging M & S’ infringement here]. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Quite the contrary, Third Restatement’s drafters criticized comment j’s presumption language as “unfortunate” and stated that it shouldn’t be followed. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:36 am
The Court of Appeal here determined that Arnold J's decision to grant permission was based on a flawed exercise of discretion, inviting him to re-exercise it.Then, on 21 May 2013, Arnold J delivered one of his characteristically Arnoldian epics at [2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch), noted here on 23 May 2013, consisting of no fewer than 326 paragraphs. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 3:44 am
(This last part has been addressed in proposed amendments to the CSIS Act in Bill C-44.) [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:24 pm
(c) The second problem comes with what might be called “totting up”. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
We're trying an innovation this week. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm
Since the Claimant’s husband was due to leave the army in February 2014 after twenty-two years’ service he would have returned to England one and a half to two years before that date to undertake re-settlement training. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:25 am
Peter Kindler: “Corporate Group Liability between Contract and Tort under the Brussels I Regulation” The judgment of the CJEU of 17 October 2013 (C-519/12 – OTP Bank vs. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:23 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Juvenile Law Opinions Body: AC36687 - In re Adriana C. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 2:24 pm
I thought I’d pass along this very interesting article by Judge Andrew J. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm
Besson & A-L- Graf-brugère, Le droit de vote des expatriés, le consensus européen et la marge d’appréciation des États (Cour eur. dr. h., arrêt Sitaropoulos et Giakoumopoulos c. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
How much money was Howard Hughes accused of giving to the Nixon re-election campaign? [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
The most-consulted French-language decision was Dunsmuir c. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
D’Amato, Consumer Confusion and Trademark Infringement, J. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Articles by Shami Chakrabarti, Eva Brems, Alejandro Madrazo, Lucy Vickers, Noa Mendelsohn Aviv, Karon Monaghan, Marvin Lim, Louise Melling and Priscilla J. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:55 am
Fotograma: Telemundo Descargar el documento: In re: Hon. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:44 am
If you’re interested, you can have a look at (1) the opinion below, which found that such a title was indeed trademark infringement, (2) a post by Daniel Nazer of the EFF about the case, or (3) our amicus brief, which I also quote below. [read post]
