Search for: "In re Sullivan "
Results 2241 - 2260
of 2,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2007, 9:55 am
I recently moderated a roundtable discussion by three top patent lawyers to assess the significance and impact of the Aug. 20 en banc decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, In re Seagate Technology. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:32 pm
He said non-U.S. law should be used as a “reality check,” adding, “that’s not to say we’re controlled by other countries. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:47 pm
When you’re asked for an opinion, do have one. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 10:30 am
Bill Heinze, Peter Sullivan, and Allison Tucher conferred with Bob Ambrogi on September 6, 2007, for a discussion of the significance and impact of the August 20, 2007 en banc decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, In re Seagate Technology.A transcript of their diverse views on the importance of the opinion for patent prosecutors and litigators is now available courtesy of IMS ExpertServices in the free "Bullseye" newsletter on experts and the law. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 5:41 pm
City of Mesquite, 129 F.3d 831, 832-33 (5th Cir.1997); Sullivan v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 6:19 pm
" It's pathetic that we're reduced to going to Wikipedia because the mainstream news of a current event is too skimpy. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 3:19 pm
"We're pleased at the initiatives that Royal Caribbean may be taking; we're disappointed that it has taken so long," said William M. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 9:12 pm
Writes Andrew Sullivan, expressing my thoughts exactly. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 1:38 pm
., concurs in result with separate opinion, Sullivan, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with separate opinion in which Rucker, J., concurs, Justice Dickson writes for the majority:The Indiana Medical Malpractice Act generally requires that actions for medical negligence against health care providers must first be submitted to and considered by a medical re-view panel. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 11:49 am
They already know that and they’re going to look elsewhere. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 10:48 pm
My conclusion was heavily based on the research of Danny Sullivan, a guru on this topic. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 5:32 pm
In recent years, Sullivan’s associate retention numbers have improved. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:48 pm
Gosh, even guys from the Corner agreed with Sullivan and Drum. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 6:05 am
In re Subpoena Duces Tecum, 228 F.3d 341, 347 (4th Cir. 2000). [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:15 pm
But Michael Sullivan is the head of the SPCA in Canada, had a great sort of view on it and admitted…and the article talks about the fact that people are using pet trusts more and more. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 1:02 am
Sullivan to its New York office. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 9:08 am
They're also old enough to have vast networks of contacts that Howrey can now ply for recruits and clients. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 pm
Cir. 2007), evidence "that the prior art teaches away from the claimed invention in any material respect," In re Peterson, 315 F.3d 1325, 1331 (Fed. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 8:04 am
By Kevin E. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 9:34 am
Sullivan, et al. [read post]
