Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm
The principles set out in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] A.C. 22 were stated to apply to all jurisdictions and the principles of legal personality had to be respected. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:41 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Dixon, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2163 (05 October 2012) Ferriter, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2211 (03 October 2012) Matthews, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2154 (27 September 2012) Williamson, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2114 (02 August 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Whiston, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 1374 (25 October 2012) Davies & Ors v Secretary of… [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:07 pm
Sir Robin Jacob (who retired from the Court of Appeal last year but was making one of his occasional reappearances) in giving the leading judgment noted Lord Nicholls in Mercedes Benz v Leiduck [1996] AC 284, p.308: “The court may grant an injunction against a party properly before it where this is required to avoid injustice […] The court habitually grants injunctions in respect of certain types of conduct. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
Dissenting on Rubin, Lord Clarke stated that allowing the enforcement of avoidance proceedings was in keeping with the principle of modified universalism requiring the English Courts, so far as is consistent with justice and UK public policy, to co-operate with the courts in the country of the principal liquidation to ensure that a company’s assets are distributed to the creditors under a single system. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:36 am
Pierre GoodingOn September 19, 2012, the Third District Court of Appeals decided that a first party plaintiff could not prosecute a claim against a third party defendant in Brady v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:55 am
Lord Carnwath finished by praising the judgment in Walton v The Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44, stating that making the 2008 Act work as intended is in all our interests, and that generous rules of standing are important to provide a mechanism for listening to competing interests in national infrastructure projects. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:59 am
See, for example, Campbell v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:24 am
In Gagnon v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
The appeal is set down for a one day hearing before Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 12:40 am
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:57 am
AND OTHERS v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:04 pm
On appeal to the House of Lords, the charge was upheld but the interest for me lies in LJ Bingham's analysis at para 7 of whta s 127 is for. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 3:22 am
Young At Heart - The Bluebells (1984) : (joint) authorship Hodgens v Beckenham [2003] EWCA Civ 143 He’s So Fine – The Chiffons (1963) ; My Sweet Lord – George Harrison (1970) (copying) Bright Tunes v Harrisongs (1976) 420 F Supp 177 (SD New York DC) MPAA - You wouldn’t steal a car (2004): anti-piracy video The IT Crowd (dir. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:54 am
Wilkinson stated that as a result of Lord Marland's experience, specifically citing his experience with Hunter Boots, he has a "real grip of what managing IP is like" and he understands "how, it is felt, expensive it is to develop a good IP strategy especially for an international company". [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
Wilkinson stated that as a result of Lord Marland's experience, specifically citing his experience with Hunter Boots, he has a "real grip of what managing IP is like" and he understands "how, it is felt, expensive it is to develop a good IP strategy especially for an international company". [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:39 am
The report presents a snapshot of the current state of play in relation to the European Court of Human Rights, makes for very interesting reading (trust me!). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
ASIL has published an Insight (.pdf) about the recent ICJ decision in Belgium v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm
In Whitehouse v Gay News Limited [1979] AC 617, the matter was debated in the House of Lords. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
Forfeiture by wrongdoing in a principle in the common law that was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:28 pm
In the courts Keyu v. [read post]
