Search for: "M J.1." Results 2241 - 2260 of 9,074
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2019, 7:01 am by Tinker Ready
There were so many of these charges that I came up with categories to keep track of them: 1. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Jay J then  heard an application in the case of Wright v Granath before Jay J. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 7:01 am by Patricia Hughes
” (Amselem, para. 40) He relies on Big M Drug Mart to say, The emphasis then is on personal choice of religious beliefs. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published tworulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 06211-19 Mackenzie v Press & Journal, 1 Accuracy (2018), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 03164-19 Walker & Thompson v Hull Daily Mail, 3 Harassment (2018), 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), No breach- after investigation Statements in Open Court and Apologies We are not aware of any statements in open court in the past week. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Surnommé «le petit Jérémy», il a acquis une certaine notoriété au Québec entre 2005 et 2009. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:39 am by Jay Cohen
., Houston, TX 77002 Court # Judge Location 1 Judge Alex Salgado 8th floor 2 Judge Ronnisha Bowman 8th floor 3 Judge Erica Hughes 8th floor 4 Judge Shannon Baldwin 8th floor 5 Judge David M. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm by Gordon Ahl
.: The House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing titled, "The Impeachment Inquiry Into President Donald J. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Turley v Unite the Union, heard 11 to 15 and 19 November 2019 (Nicklin J) Kirkegaard v Smith, heard 26 November 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
In Canada, such work is done for clients for the purpose of “fixing” their ERMSs and then providing a certification of compliance with this National Standard of Canada: Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN/CGSB-72.34-2017 (“72.34”).[1] That requires the application of more than 200 tests, after conducting extensive interviews of the records managers and other experts and systems-users who are accountable for the ERMS’s performance, and to obtain… [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:16 pm by Beth Boyer
September 2020: “Enhancing the Integrity of Unlawful Presence Inadmissibility Provisions” This rule makes it more likely for students and others in F, M, or J status to become out of status and subject to bars to U.S. re-admission for prior unlawful presence. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:16 pm by Beth Boyer
September 2020: “Enhancing the Integrity of Unlawful Presence Inadmissibility Provisions” This rule makes it more likely for students and others in F, M, or J status to become out of status and subject to bars to U.S. re-admission for prior unlawful presence. [read post]