Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 20,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2020, 12:05 pm
” He didn’t explain where this formula came from or why it was justified. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Contrast b/t passing off approach and German law. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 7:12 am
Don't let the horrible photo chosen by Media Matters here stop you from listening to the audio. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 4:30 am
According to Professor Foy, the judge should: (a) instead concede that interpretations A and B both seem pretty darn reasonable as a matter of conventional legal analysis, and then (b) truthfully explain whatever reasons of policy, equity, or justice moved the judge to choose one interpretation over the other. [read post]
4 May 2015, 12:11 pm
Sort them into A, B and C possibilities. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm
In fact, the technical problem defined by the [applicant], i.e. finding particular colouring agents having specific properties cannot logically have as a solution a method of colouring hair with known colouring compositions characterized by the length of time they are applied to the hair.With regard to the comparative tests on which the Applicant relied, the comparison with the closest state of the art must be such that the purported effect is convincingly shown to have its origin in the… [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:00 pm
Indeed, on a given matter, only one associate may be staffed on the matter, so you will also be required to do work that may be considered “beneath you. [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:02 pm
The next two questions (b and c) seem to matter a lot, however. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:36 pm
PATRICIA T. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:46 am
In the Matter of the Adoption of K.A.H., 2015-Ohio-1971 (10th Dist.) [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:29 am
Rule 26(b) commands that all discovery be both relevant and proportional.Xarelto, 2016 WL 311762, at *4. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
I have shown one of the claimant's registered trade marks and one of the defendant's signs, but you can see them all in the judgment if you click on the link, should you feel it necessary.There was not a high enough level of similarity to find a likelihood of confusion under Article 9(2)(b), but that didn't matter much because the Deputy Judge held that there was unfair advantage, so Red Bull succeeded. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
I have shown one of the claimant's registered trade marks and one of the defendant's signs, but you can see them all in the judgment if you click on the link, should you feel it necessary.There was not a high enough level of similarity to find a likelihood of confusion under Article 9(2)(b), but that didn't matter much because the Deputy Judge held that there was unfair advantage, so Red Bull succeeded. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:05 am
Assuming the appellant succeeded in overcoming this objection, the subject-matter of claim 1 appeared to lack an inventive step.VI. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 3:32 pm
R. 28–1(b), and this case shows why. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 1:13 am
After discussing the Louboutin shoe sole case some time ago, one envisioned the matter going ahead to the CJEU without a hitch. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Ease of copying also matters; it’s not always easy to copy a visual appearance. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
When I didn't congratulate the prevailing lawyers, that was generally because (a) I thought the decision as a whole (and not just the part I wrote about) was split enough to not be a victory, (b) the lawyers' names weren't easily obtainable, (c) there were so many lawyers on the winning side that listing them all would have been a chore, or (d) I forgot. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:54 pm
(See 50 U.S.C. 1702(b)). [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am
RT: not sure that disclaimers ever matter to future rights, but collateral estoppel/B&B is a big deal now, as is the loss of potential defenses after Jack Daniels. [read post]
