Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 2241 - 2260 of 21,682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Indiana v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:57 am by Shams Hirji
Co., 553 F.3d 447, 450 (6th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:51 am by Mark Brnovich
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the upcoming argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 7:00 am
Today marks the 25th anniversary of the existence of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Nyazee, The Probable Islamic State of the Future, (October 21, 2023).Mark Satta, 303 Creative v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
United States, marking the second time the Pennsylvania woman will appear before that tribunal. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:00 pm
Corp. v Huang, 94 AD2d 176, 180 [internal quotation marks omitted]).Accordingly, the AD2 reversed the underlying determination, and dismissed the causes of action in question.Was that a toothless agreement? [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 9:58 pm
UK Registry to warn TM owners of dangers of conflictThe IPKat recently received a note from Guy Heath (Nabarro Nathanson) on the current state of play with regard to trade mark oppositions in the United Kingdom. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:11 pm by Howard Wasserman
United States marks another gap between constitutional rights and constitutional remedies. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The image of row after row of plain white crosses marking the overseas graves of soldiers was emblazoned on the minds of Americans at home. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am by Söğüt Atilla
The Retromark update also listed the infamous Lidl v Tesco case, in which the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) reversed the copyright infringement finding but reluctantly upheld the trade mark infringement ruling; the Lifestyle Equities v Amazon case, where the UK Supreme Court confirmed that Amazon US was targeting UK consumers; and the commonly misunderstood Supermacs v EUIPO case where, the General Court of the EU merely stated that McDonalds’… [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:55 am by sally
a SL [2011] EWCA Civ 618; [2011] WLR (D) 173 “A person threatened another with proceedings for infringement of a registered trade mark within section 21 of the Trade Marks Act 1994 if he stated or implied that he would bring a claim if the other did not agree to the terms he proposed. [read post]