Search for: "Montana State Supreme Court" Results 2241 - 2260 of 2,756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2021, 2:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
Supreme Court explained long ago: "We are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:06 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
”Oregon and Washington are two of 10 states — including California, Colorado, Hawai‘i, Maine, Montana (via state Supreme Court ruling), New Jersey, New Mexico,  Vermont, — as well as Washington, D.C., that have authorized medical aid in dying. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:06 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
”Oregon and Washington are two of 10 states — including California, Colorado, Hawai‘i, Maine, Montana (via state Supreme Court ruling), New Jersey, New Mexico,  Vermont, — as well as Washington, D.C., that have authorized medical aid in dying. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities Alabama – Supreme Court Stops Lower Court Order Requiring Alabama to Draw a New District Voting Map Favorable to Black Residents MSN – Robert Barnes (Washington Post) | Published: 2/7/2022 The U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:02 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Last year New Mexico and Montana became the first two states to require a conviction for law enforcement to take possession of cash and property involved in crimes.Grits had earlier predicted asset forfeiture reform would be in play when the Texas Legislature convenes in 2017, and these developments are all evidence that reformers, particularly on the conservative end of the spectrum, are busily gearing up for that fight. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Eight states currently allow medical aid in dying: California, Colorado, Hawai’i, Montana (via state Supreme Court ruling), New Jersey, Oregon, Washington, and Vermont. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 12:30 pm by John Ross
On January 22, the Supreme Court will consider whether states may exclude religious schools from generally available scholarship programs, or whether such exclusions violate the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2019, 11:30 am by John Ross
She recants, but a state court determines the recantation was not credible, and the Colorado Supreme Court declines to order a new trial. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court’s conservative majority seemed sympathetic to Sen. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by Scott Bomboy
In 2011, the state Supreme Court of Washington ruled in State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
The Supreme Court has struggled for decades to explain why constitutional law sometimes prevents states from providing local remedies for local injuries. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/289052.opn.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Supreme Court Bond v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
Over at Slate, Emily Bazelon considers lessons to be learned from this past Term and the Affordable Care Act cases in particular regarding Supreme Court oral arguments. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 3:14 am
Some states, including New Jersey, Maryland, Montana andNebraska, are already moving towards an outright ban. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:48 am by Nate Persily
Speaking of Texas, it is interesting to note that the Latino-majority district (Texas 23) that was redrawn following the Supreme Court's decision in LULAC v Perry has now switched back into Republican hands. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
If he had been that judge during his tenure as a Supreme Court judge he’d be celebrated, even worshipped, by Indian country. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court to be conditioned on the creation of an ethics code for the justices. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:21 pm by Theodore Harvatin
Montana Supreme Court Holds 24/7 Sobriety Program is Constitutional, Illinois DUI Lawyer Blawg, September 1, 2015. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
The Spending Power   “The Congress shall have Power . . . to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States;” From 1789 until 1936, the Supreme Court did not settle the question of whether congressional spending can be only in service of the other enumerated powers, or can instead be for anything that advances “the general welfare. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Justices Discussed, But Did Not Agree on Code of Conduct MSN – Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 2/9/2023 Although U.S. [read post]