Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 2241 - 2260 of 6,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2017, 11:52 am by Shahram Miri
In a recent unpublished appellate opinion, the parties unfortunately decided against such a route and further litigation ensued.Lough v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:06 am by Monika Zdzieborska
In the US, (i) Case3:15-cr-00201-WHO, United States of America v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
Its interpretation of C-215/14 is clearly different from that of Arnold J (see T-112/13, paras. 97-101). [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:02 am by INFORRM
Newly Published Cases for Explanation or Comment ZA Council v MT & Ors [2017] EWFC 12 (14 February 2017): An interesting example of extensive redaction  This is the published judgment of a decision by Moor J sitting as a High Court Judge in the Family Court. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:37 pm by familoo
This, the judge, stated should help concentrate minds on the relevant issues in cross-examination.) [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:25 am
  Instead, AbbVie stated that a late insufficiency objection had given rise to its decision. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:34 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Charbonier Laureano radicó el Proyecto de la Cámara 640 para crear una nueva ley que se conocerá como la Ley para las Iglesias-Escuela. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:35 am
The direct implication of this is that the Court is very vigilant when interpreting provisions in the relevant directives – notably the InfoSoc Directive – and not particularly keen in tolerating national solutions that go astray from what the relevant body of EU legislation allows Member States to do. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
It is unsurprising that Lord Justice Leveson recommended that these provisions be repealed (Report, Part L, Chap 1, para 51). [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Vancouver Community College v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 10:12 pm by Darren Olivier
SABC, a state owned company, contented that the decisions do not constitute administrative decisions but contractual ones under their agreement with Via. [read post]