Search for: "People v. Greene" Results 2241 - 2260 of 2,575
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
It is not enough that an automobile operated by defendant and one by his codefendant left an intersection abreast when the traffic light changed to green and, thereafter, travelled abreast at about 55 miles an hour, each car jockeying for position" (People v Grund, 14 NY2d at 34). [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 4:40 pm by John Pottow
  Until yesterday, that is, when we saw that the Ninth Circuit handed down the decision reversing the bankruptcy and district court judgements that had so exercised us.Here's the link: Greene v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 8:20 pm by chucknewton
  Remember, Green Tree manages secured money loans on homes to some of the least credit worthy people in this country. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
Raich would justify a federal mandate for people to buy health insurance, but Somin believes current doctrine on the Commerce Clause is wrong. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(East Sandwich, MA; Susan Chapman, President) Blue Sky & Green Leaves Inc. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm
I am always a bit humbled when a victim of food poisoning stands up to the corporations who poisoned them with food – especially food labeled “triple washed” and “ready to eat. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 6:27 am
One of these class actions was certified in Newfoundland in 2007, and is now under appeal (Ring v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Stoughton, MA; John Greene, President) Advantage Insulation, Incorporated (East Falmouth, MA; Katherine Collette, President) Advocates For Rockland Abington, Weymouth, Hingham, Inc. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
#IPBC DuncanBucknell Sure - v different models, regulation, etc - RT @DuncanBucknell: Are the IP issues completely different in green tech vs pharma? [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:04 pm
" This quote is unnerving to people who believe that our constitutions were designed to protect property owners, not property takers.Dissent at 23 (citing Green Bay Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]