Search for: "Stanford Law Communications"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 2,446
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2008, 3:09 am
" Introduced by Congressman Bob Goodlatte (bio) Frank Pasquale, Associate Professor of Law at Seton Hall Law School (bio) Lauren Gelman, Executive Director and Lecturer of Law at Stanford Law (bio) "Can ISP Immunity Survive the Onslaught of Web 2.0" General welcoming from Congressman Mike Honda (bio) Introduced by Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (bio) Mike Fertik, CEO of Reputation Defender (bio) Dan Dougherty, eBay(bio) "The… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (IPRoo), Giving Goliath the slingshot: Review of the National Innovation System on 'the costs of enforcing IP rights': (Australia & New Zealand Intellectual Property Law), Take patent policy away from lawyers, says Australian government report: (IAM), Advisory Council announces review of scope of patentable subject matter: (International Law Office), Federal Court's flu shot for patent law: Notice to Practitioners - Proceedings under the Patents… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 11:38 am
The 1963 copyright on the movie was set to expire in 1991, but it was renewed that year by Mirisch's successors-in-interest, MGM-Pathe Communications Co./ Geoffrey Productions Inc. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 1:06 am
If you want to learn more about intellectual property in general, we have a page listing major treatises on the topic, as well as a list of intellectual property resources we provide for the Georgetown Law community. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 3:55 am
The Persistence of Exceptionalism in American Procedural Law' on SSRN (Stanford Journal of International Law, Vol. 11/1 - 2008). [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
’: (Michael Geist), (The Trademark Blog), Globe and Mail report on new McGill study that concludes IP laws may be stifling innovation: (Michael Geist), C-61 – Dead or undead? [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:51 am
Contrary to a 2005 article in the Stanford Law Review, Gary Boone did not invent the integrated circuit.SEPARATELY, Kaminsky showed how the flaw could also be used to intercept or manipulate e-mails.The Krebs paper has a link to a PowerPoint by Kaminsky, which mentions the DNSRake. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 8:03 pm
It’s like a mini-lesson in intellectual property law. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:31 am
Lemley of Stanford Law School and Kimberly A. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:48 pm
One of the co-founders, Andrea Chavez (Harvard, Stanford law), is pictured, presumably with her significant and their dogs. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 6:27 pm
They also want to know whether the test of web-surveillance technology from NebuAd complied with federal communications law. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 3:13 pm
BBLP is an organization that was created last fall by Stanford students (referenced here on N&B) and is itching to grow. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 10:37 pm
"This is an historic test for whether the law will protect the open Internet. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
The bloodshed is real and deeply destructive of the common decency of the community; the benefits are illusory. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 1:51 am
- Emily Chan Emily Chan is a new contributor to the Nonprofit Law Blog. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 3:26 pm
A June 30, 2008 Stanford Law School press release describing the article can be found here. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:36 pm
I have only counted this litigation once, as has, for example, the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse (as shown here). [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 1:28 am
After leaving York, I had little enough luck in finding the perfectly ideal farm or friends to start that perfectly ideal commune — are you surprised? [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:39 pm
Others, such as Stanford Law Professor Larry Lessig and the leaders of the non-profit Sunlight Foundation will explain their big ideas and demonstrate the tools they're building to shine the spotlight into the darkest and most obscure corners of the Washington bureaucracy. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
[Disclosure: Howe & Russell, P.C. and the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic represent the respondents in the case; Akin Gump is not involved in the case.] [read post]
