Search for: "State v. Daniel" Results 2241 - 2260 of 5,630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Brad Miller
State legislatures have discretion to set tax and spending priorities, the Supreme Court said in 1977 in United States Trust Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
United States Donald Trump is to claim presidential immunity in a defamation case brought against him by former contestant on the Apprentice who accused him of unwanted sexual contact. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 6:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The courts are getting the hang of it, as shown by this discrimination case that the Second Circuit resolved this week.The case is Alvarado v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Kirschner, the case aimed at deindexing a RipOffReport post about Daniel Warner; nor Howard Marks, the defendant in Gottuso v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Supreme Court Declines to Hear Vimeo Copyright Infringement Case First off today, the JURIST reports that the Supreme Court has declined to hear the Capitol Records v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:05 pm by Aaron Rubin
  On March 21, 2017, Judge George Daniels of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York partially granted and partially denied defendant’s motion to dismiss in Commerzbank AG v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 12:37 pm by Rory Little
United States in 2015 (holding that a fish is not a “tangible object” under the federal obstruction of justice statute) and Bond v. [read post]