Search for: "State v. Harris"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 5,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2009, 4:54 am
Harris, 908 A.2d 196 (2006), and is designed to provide same-sex couples with the same rights granted to married couples. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:45 am
In State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 8:04 am
The lower court case is Brockert v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
On the contrary, Mr Carr QC stated that issue estoppel and abuse of process are “all about justice” and noted the courts’ attempts to restrict the scope of strict action estoppel in cases such as Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 precisely because it can lead to injustice. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:01 am
United States, 11-883; Brito v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:50 pm
Barko v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 11:53 am
— United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
* No More (Trade Mark) Trouble With Harry (Winston) Marie-Andrée recounts the melting tale of the Winston family, where Harry built up a worldwide famous jewellery company in 1932 which now tries to prevent his son Bruce from registering his own name and surname as a trade mark for jewellery with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:53 am
But not all reforms are made impossible; moreover, the most effective way to change individual constitutional doctrines is not Article V amendment. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
Simon Harris agreed, pointing his speech in the same direction. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
Lee v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:46 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am
Several justices in previous cases, such as Mitchell v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm
Harris from North Carolina – further reveal, the court simply is not going to permit states to be casual in invoking the VRA to justify race-based districting. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
The district court granted summary judgment in defendants' favor because Kolpacke had failed to show that defendants' had arbitrarily and capriciously applied the terms of the pension plan in calculating Kolpacke's estimated benefits. 08a0191p.06 2008/05/22 Harris v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 8:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 11:10 am
See State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
” Harris v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 10:37 am
United States v. [read post]
