Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 11,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:09 am
United States Second Circuit, 08/03/2010 US v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:44 am
(Separately, a parallel private action, Ploss v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 8:41 pm
On 14 November 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its judgment in Armin Maletic and Marianne Maletic v lastminute.com GmbH and TUI Österreich GmbH. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm
Since it might look like Eugene and I are in some kind of disagreement here, I thought I would explain: My main point was that the state standing question resolved in Biden v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:38 am
Tim Towarak (Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act – Subsistence Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlKitras v. [read post]
Hedge Fund Adviser’s Cert Petition Cites Federal-State Conflicts on Fiduciary Duty, Seller Liability
15 Sep 2015, 3:01 am
The adviser argued that those holdings created conflicts between state and federal laws regarding the fiduciary duty owed to investors in hedge funds and regarding the imposition of seller liability (Ellrich v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:05 am
The European Court of Justice (Third Chamber) delivered its judgment in Solvay v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
Tam (2017) and Iancu v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 9:28 am
That ruling came in the case of Liberty University v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Maine Pub. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:31 am
American Civil Liberties Union of Maine Foundation v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 7:09 am
Green is solicitor general of the state of Utah, which joined a 13-state amicus brief supporting the petitioner in Seila Law v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:24 pm
See Nigra v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 10:04 am
(See Richardson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm
Indeed, at the very minimum, he would be required, under the rule in Wilson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
means that where there is EU legislation which pursues a number of objectives, one of which (animal welfare) is the main objective, a Member State which adopts a standard in the context of the discretion conferred on it by a provision of that legislation must comply with that main objective without hindering the attainment of the other objectives of that legislation. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 8:08 am
Probably the main reason why someone would go the LLC route to ‘S’ status is creditor protection. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 8:08 am
Probably the main reason why someone would go the LLC route to ‘S’ status is creditor protection. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 8:58 am
The Court of Appeals rejects that effort.The case is Garcia v. [read post]
