Search for: "State v. R. E. J" Results 2241 - 2260 of 2,733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2023, 2:27 am by Peter J. Sluka
  While Massachusetts has a statutory scheme similar to New York’s—including a provision stating that dissent and appraisal is the frozen-out members’ exclusive remedy—the State’s highest Court, in Allison v Eriksson, 98 NE3d 143, 146 (Mass. 2018) held that the Court may still “provid[e] the dissenting members with an equitable remedy other than the statutory right of distribution. . . . [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:00 am by Doug Cornelius
IA-2204; IC-26299 -Compliance Programs of Investment Companies and Investment Advisers SEC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am by Robert Liles
”  The Final Rule under 42 CFR § 424.535(a), was published in order to implement sections 1866(j)(5) and 1902(kk)(3) of the Social Security Act (as amended by the Affordable Care Act). [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 9:36 am by fjhinojosa
Beck gave a CLE presentation to the Lubbock Area Bar Association titled “United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm by admin
Tatel, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and Steven R. [read post]
16 May 2008, 9:40 pm
Stevens said.He added that while Diodoro was viewing the pornography, he had the ability to download, print, copy or e-mail the images.Judge Richard B. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:26 pm
  The Cuban government announced, as is its habit now, through the show "Mesa Redonda", a set of potentially far ranging reforms of the non state sector and its regulation. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:51 pm by WSLL
CiteID=464948Appeal from the District Court of Big Horn County, The Honorable Steven R. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 Nothing in this Ordinance shall prohibit an entity authorized by state law to dispense Medical Marijuana from making deliveries of Medical Marijuana to the residence or business of an authorized individual or health care facility as permitted by relevant state law, subject to the applicable requirements of this Ordinance. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 Nothing in this Ordinance shall prohibit an entity authorized by state law to dispense Medical Marijuana from making deliveries of Medical Marijuana to the residence or business of an authorized individual or health care facility as permitted by relevant state law, subject to the applicable requirements of this Ordinance. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[Not for secular courts to judge, holds the Arizona Court of Appeals] From In re Ball v. [read post]