Search for: "State v. State"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 258,389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
. * * * Today’s topic – “Regulating Finance in a Changing Administrative State” – is no doubt a timely one, but also one that could easily serve as my job description. [read post]
The Hydraulic Effect of Loper Bright Enterprises in Consumer Finance: More Regulation By Enforcement
10 Jul 2024, 8:00 pm
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:14 pm
[An important case on "The Digital Fourth Amendment"] Regular readers may recall my prior coverage of United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:10 pm
State of Texas v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:05 pm
The fear of a retaliatory prosecution is no illusion: The authors examine a recent Texas case, Villarreal v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 3:56 pm
The case is Solix Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 2:11 pm
Other States’ Decisions: No Standing to Challenge the Rule Conversely, a federal court in Arkansas determined in States of Tennessee, Arkansas et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm
In Dept of State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:44 pm
Project applicants can use TMUD credits alongside other various local, state and federal credits and incentives to attain financing necessary to complete their projects. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:29 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:30 pm
527, Decision No. 15,937; see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:30 pm
527, Decision No. 15,937; see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:26 pm
(Land Into Trust; Easement; Intervention) United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:23 pm
The Court in Loper expressly stated that it is not overturning previous cases that relied on Chevron. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
Department of State et al v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
Department of State et al v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:58 am
Supreme Court vacated a DC Circuit ruling in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) whistleblower case Lissack v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:31 am
Rightly so.I'm less confident that Justice Wiley is correct when he says "This mental state—requiring only proof that Canales voluntarily inserted his finger or penis into his stepdaughter’s vagina, without any further level of mental culpability—satisfies the presumption of mandatory culpability. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:51 am
”] From Abitbol v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:50 am
The order in Rose v. [read post]
