Search for: "State v. Washington"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 17,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
The article also presents research from the Powell Archives at Washington and Lee University School of Law.On its face, Powell’s Roe vote is perplexing due to its inconsistency with his stated philosophy of judicial restraint. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
In Davis v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 am
On Wednesday the justices will hear oral argument in Washington v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 6:18 am
United States and Kimbrough v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 12:50 pm
The UCSA legalized the limited production, processing, and sale of recreational marijuana to persons twenty-one years and older, and created a regulatory state licensing system through the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:54 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:51 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:10 am
Reporting on the Puerto Rico decision, the Washington Post points out that the decision "puts the First Circuit back in play in the national litigation, although every state in the circuit already recognizes same-sex marriage. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
Norton v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
Norton v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 10:58 am
Supreme Court today denied review in American Freedom Defense Initiative v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:05 am
Supreme Court this week in Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 7:30 am
Hopkins has an op-ed that begins, "Any Virginian outraged by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 5:06 am
In Dartmouth College v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 8:30 am
Doehne v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:45 am
In Obergefell v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm
As reported by the Washington Post, the U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 8:30 am
Doehne v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 6:49 am
Specifically, the Panel (at the Ninth Circuit) erred in barring Easterday from presenting NIL claims involving trespass on his rights as recently as six months before the action was filed, based on a misreading of the statute of limitations law that Washington state would apply. [read post]
