Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 40,665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 9:19 am
In the recently decided Chadbourne & Parke v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
(quoting Mozes v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:47 am
R (Haney & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice (10 December 2014) Indeterminate sentences and the inadequate funding of rehabilitation during them has posed problems since Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences hamstrung the system. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit decided in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:29 am
In People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm
V(A)(3) (emphasis added). [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
But to the stated end? [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:05 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
State courts will have their own unique rules. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:19 am
As technology makes the word smaller, it becomes more and more important for companies to protect trademarks. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:09 am
Yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in Kawashima v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
Had he established a violation, then it would've been up to the State to rebut the presumption of injury. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:54 am
The word “use” in the section is directed to real or material use, not permitted use. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:24 pm
In other words, a violation of that statute inherently constitutes an injury to the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
The word does not have a fixed legal signification. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:12 pm
The decision of First Department, in King v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:00 pm
For instance, United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:12 am
Additional state parties are Indiana and Louisiana. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:48 am
We previously wrote about the First Circuit's decision in Bartlett v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
Worse for Comphy, the court characterizes the Comphy word mark as descriptive and not commercially strong because the word mark isn’t heavily advertised to consumers. [read post]
