Search for: "Stephens v. United States"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 3,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2021, 10:26 am
United States, involves claims of a person convicted of murder arguing he cannot be executed because of his intellectual disability. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
The PEW Research Group’s surveys of public opinion in the United States document the fundamental regime change that has taken place over the last half century. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 11:50 am
Julia Solomon-Strauss and Stephen Szrom discussed the latest developments in United States v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:43 pm
United States, about a “knowingly” provision of a federal firearm statute. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:19 am
Harris v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:23 pm
That conclusion, the court explained, rested on the fact that Hernandez was not a U.S. citizen and did not have any connection to the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:30 pm
For example, there is a presumption that U.S. law does not apply outside the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:58 pm
V. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 1:18 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
'Elstad', 'Seibert' Analyzed in Ruling That Two-Step Strategy Not Used in Post-'Miranda' Confession
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:42 pm
At issue in Carson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
S. ___, ___ (2017) (slip op., at 9) (quoting United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:57 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Siegel v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm
Justice Stephen Breyer did not take part in the decision because his brother, a judge in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, sat on the Ninth Circuit panel that had decided the matter under review. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm
Both parties, and the United States as an amicus, agreed in this case that these provisions allow courts the ability to dismiss such suits without prejudice. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:51 am
United Business Machines, Inc., D2001-0577 (WIPO June 6, 2001); Government of Canada v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:07 am
United States and Collins v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:37 pm
Frederick (06-278) also should count as a 5-4 decision because Justice Stephen G. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:17 pm
Stephens, 31 P.3d 465, 471 (Or. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
