Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2016, 6:00 pm
As the state’s Third District Court of Appeals recently explained, courts considering a request for grandparent visitation rights focus on the grandchild’s best interests, among other factors. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 7:23 am
Harris v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
The Appeal The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm
EW v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 9:06 am
In Block v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 4:30 pm
The court acknowledged conflicting decisions on the point but quoted the Ninth Circuit’s decision in UMG Recordings v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 6:40 am
The court held that the State has a strong interest in protecting its citizens and promoting water safety through random safety checks. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:45 am
That was the result the Court overturned in Sackett, et al., v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 2:50 am
There is a strong presumption that criminal offences require mens rea. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
The complaint argues that the NDAA deprives Huawei of the liberty to sell to federal agencies, as well as by stigmatizing it and “discouraging other entities across the United States from doing business with Huawei. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:35 am
The private parties in this case cannot avail themselves of the “special solicitude” for states found in Mass v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:56 pm
On the other hand, if RSL moves the lawsuit to California, it will run into California's strong anti-SLAPP law. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien, 614 F3d 638 (7th Cir 2010)… [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:32 am
”) But as one of us explains today in a Justia column (and as Justice Ginsburg’s majority opinion in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:52 am
Blawgletter said last June that the decision in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:33 am
Capone v. [read post]
Case Law, Strasbourg: Ruusunen v Finland, The Private of Life of a Prime Minister – Dominic Crossley
20 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
The right to privacy for a European head of state has hardly been more topical. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:53 am
And in the case raised by Andrew, Welch v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am
Later, the Court of Justice of the EU brought a bit more balance into that analysis with its Huawei v. [read post]
