Search for: "Sunday v State"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 2,613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 2:17 am
First of all, of course, there is nothing objectionable about insisting that state-provided healthcare would deliver value in terms of decreasing waste, increasing productivity and quality of healthcare etc… That is not, however, what it appears to me that Cllr. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
” 21 July | Frans Cornelis Adrianus VAN ANRAAT v the Netherlands (European Court of Human Rights) A man was prosecuted for supplying thiodiglycol (mustard gas) to Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:25 pm
In today’s case (Aymont v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 10:25 pm
Torture inquiry details announced Bloody Sunday report to have a chilling effect on future inquiries? [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
Reynolds and Jameel – the existing law Before examining the proposals in Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill it is perhaps worth summarising shortly the existing state of the Reynolds common law defence. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
Kesler, Kansas decision as to lack of authority of MERS; LaSalle Bank v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:31 pm
United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:01 am
According to the Sunday Telegraph today, the Law Commission will recommend that prenuptial agreements be made legally enforceable. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:53 pm
In fact, I wonder what John Adams would have made of a Supreme Court decision like Scott v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:35 pm
Her key arguments were the divisions between criminal and civil issues (in particular, the role of contracts and terms of service), and she mentioned a number of key US decisions (such as the Lori Drew case and Register.com v Verio) and the problems stemming from then, including a pretty obvious circuit split (e.g. the difference between IAC v Citrin and LVRC v Brekka). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:56 am
Malhame v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 1:31 pm
The legal ramifications of information of this nature becoming public were seen in Gray v Minister for Justice. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:41 pm
So on Sunday when you are watching, or hearing, fireworks perhaps you will stop and remember that Disney patented a precision firework display. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:39 am
The first case, which bore Senator Byrd's name — Raines v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:11 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 11:32 am
of State. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:02 am
” (Sunday Times v United Kingdom (1979) 2 EHRR 245 [65]) The Convention right to respect for private life was invoked only against state interferences with privacy. [read post]
