Search for: "TAYLOR v TAYLOR" Results 2241 - 2260 of 4,755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2018, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
A retiree not in the collective bargaining unit when he or she became aggrieved may not file a "contract grievance" set out in the collective bargaining agreementMeyer v City of Long Beach, 2018 NY Slip Op 06526, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentCertain retired police officers [Plaintiffs] sought to recover damages resulting from an alleged breach of the terms and conditions set out in a collective bargaining agreement [CBA] established pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil… [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
A retiree not in the collective bargaining unit when he or she became aggrieved may not file a "contract grievance" set out in the collective bargaining agreementMeyer v City of Long Beach, 2018 NY Slip Op 06526, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentCertain retired police officers [Plaintiffs] sought to recover damages resulting from an alleged breach of the terms and conditions set out in a collective bargaining agreement [CBA] established pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil… [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:10 am
----Last week, the European Patent Litigators Association, EPLIT, ran a mock trial in Munich based on the famous Improver v Remington litigation. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This determination made her subject to a 15% health insurance premium contribution requirement set out in the controlling Taylor Law collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 8:45 pm
v=o0OIfdlwZHwVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991https://www.backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
A retiree not in the collective bargaining unit when he or she became aggrieved may not file a "contract grievance" set out in the collective bargaining agreementMeyer v City of Long Beach, 2018 NY Slip Op 06526, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentCertain retired police officers [Plaintiffs] sought to recover damages resulting from an alleged breach of the terms and conditions set out in a collective bargaining agreement [CBA] established pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil… [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:35 pm by Hadley Baker, Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the Northern District of California’s order granting a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 9:20 am
After 17 years and a bizarre series of events including a former judge representing the defendant, pension money originally belonging to 7,000 employees of Manitoba Telecom Services has been ordered returned to its rightful owners.The Supreme Court of Canada in Telecommunications Employees Association of Manitoba v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:17 am by Laura Sandwell
Adamson v Paddico Ltd and Taylor (on behalf of the Society for the Protection of Markham & Little Francis) v Betterment Properties Ltd, heard 15 January 2014. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:58 am
Taylor was unable to determine whether this key logger was installed or whether it had been placed on the computer through a virus obtained using the Internet. . . .Horowitz v. [read post]
Authors: Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Dylan Sault and Steven Li  Welcome to our first wrap up of the year! [read post]