Search for: "The Book Review Editor"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 3,259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2010, 10:41 am
She now works with battered women and has written a book “Surviving Intimate Terrorism”. [read post]
28 May 2011, 9:36 am
Champion has presented numerous lectures nationally and internationally, published numerous books and law review articles, and been a featured expert on many television and radio programs throughout the world. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Nick Cohen’s new polemical book, ‘You Can’t Read This Book: Censorship in an Age of Freedom‘ was published by 4th Estate on 19 January 2012. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In theory, the task of the ICLR’s reporters and editors was to review decisions and to select for reporting those which were useful as precedents because they stated or clarified some particular point of law, while excluding those which simply repeated existing law, were limited to their facts or otherwise had no value for subsequent disputes. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 2:41 am
I met with Connie Crosby and Simon Chester of sLaw, as well as the editor of the Blawg Review, who is traveling the world and meeting with blawgers of interest. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:12 pm
Book Review: Law and Neuroscience Law and Neuroscience by Owen Jones, Jeffrey Schall, and Francis Shen has just published and is as long as any Harry Potter tale at more than 800 pages. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 6:30 pm
She was an editor of the William Mitchell Law Review. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 7:25 am
We’re very excited to announce Cyndi Suarez our first new editor in chief since our founding in 1999: https://bit.ly/3rRowWf #nonprofit #nonprofitnewsNonprofit Quarterly: When looking at NPQ’s top reads of the year, two themes rose to the top: Responding to the pandemic and national uprising against anti-Black racism Reader Favorites: 10 Leading Articles from 2020Stanford Social Innovation Review: Part of an ‘Up for Debate’ series at SSIR Online that shares… [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
”[6] This understanding of Dred Scott became an article of faith with second-wave historians.[7] Starting in the mid-1990s, however, Graber published two important articles and a book that dismantled the conventional view that Dred Scott represented egregious judicial error. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:24 am
Working through an agent or attorney allows the author to preserve his creative relationship with the editor or publishing house. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 5:51 am
His most recent book, The Kingdom of the Deep, was reviewed in both The Guardian and The Telegraph. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:22 pm
., Penguin Books, p. 231 translations by Ruth L. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, August 4, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of July 28-August 3, 2023. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:28 am
Areticles (not to exceed 12 000 words), case notes and book reviews (up to 5,000 words) and opinion and practice pieces (up to 3,000 words) are welcome. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:46 pm
" Here is my response to David Brooks, en passant, taken with some editing from the conclusion of an essay of mine in the Columbia Law Review in 1996, reviewing books on lawyers, elites, and the therapeutic New Class. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, August 4, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of July 28-August 3, 2023. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:07 am
As editor, IPKat team member Jeremy is very fond of all the contributions to this journal -- and all the contributors -- so he doesn't have any favourites. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, October 7, 2022 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of September 30-October 6, 2022. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:00 am
Editor Michael B. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 9:25 am
It's pretty clear it was rejected at the editor level, not after being sent out for review (my experience from having had rejected a book manuscript that richly deserved to be rejected is that if the latter, you see the reviews). [read post]
