Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 2241 - 2260 of 14,190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2010, 1:14 pm by admin
The Supreme Court’s June decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 7:52 am
Appellate Court Determines Who is Responsible for Previous Costs A recent case from Cook County, Shannon Court Condominium Association v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
The laws that apply to generic drugs recently shifted in favor of the manufacturers at the expense of injured consumers in 2011 when the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Pilva, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:30 am by Beth Graham
The National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”) stance with regard to class-action prohibitions included in employment contracts appears increasingly likely to be reviewed by the United States Supreme Court in the near future. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
” Although the destination country in this case was the United States, the close and detailed regulation by the EU represented the claimants’ best hope. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 8:00 am by Steven Cohen
  Sutton states that, as a result of the fall, she lost consciousness and suffered a closed head injury. [read post]
On Friday, June 28, 2024, the United States Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am by Bernard Bell
Regulatory Background The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (“MSA”) establishes a program to conserve and manage of fishery resources within 200 nautical miles of the United States coastline. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm by cdw
” [via Tim Cone @ Defense Newsletter Blog]   Other United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States, makes that point only then to go on and draw the distinction. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Glenn, supra.The Court of Appeals goes on to explain how and why the prosecution arose, what it involved and why Glenn was convicted:Defendant, an officer with the United States Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), worked at the Canada–United States border in Detroit, Michigan, during the relevant year of 2013. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 12:40 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
Unable to show “coercion” of their religious beliefs, the Indian plaintiffs could not rely on the First Amendment to protect their interests in aboriginal territory now owned by the United States. [read post]