Search for: "United States v. Cooper" Results 2241 - 2260 of 4,613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Malcolm, 803 F.2d 46, 54 (2d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 910 (1987) (city has standing for third-party claim against state as to claims based on prison overcrowding); United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Fortunately, Houston is one of the most resilient cities in the United States, and optimism can be found on every corner. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:56 am by Susan Brenner
Sandra Lynn Teague was charged with and convicted of exceeding her authorized access to a computer and obtaining information from a department of the United States in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 8:06 am
Box 637, Jesse Cooper Building Dover, DE 19903 Phone: (302) 744-4553 State CHIP Program (health care for low-income uninsured children) Delaware Healthy Children Program P.O. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am by Jim Lindgren
Railroad Commission—another unconstitutional conditions case—the Court declared: "It is inconceivable that guaranties embedded in the Constitution of the United States may thus be manipulated out of existence. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 11:31 am by Nathan Swire
United States, known as the “Microsoft Ireland,” case in which the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
   United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:12 am
 Charter 77 criticized the government for failing to implement human rights provisions of a number of documents it had signed, including the 1960 Constitution of Czechoslovakia, the Final Act of the 1975 Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (Basket III of the Helsinki Accords), and 1966 United Nations covenants on political, civil, economic, and cultural rights. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Hornak of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in the case of Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]