Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 2241 - 2260 of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
Mark Schweizer explores the case law. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
The evidence showed that Petitioner Cubatabaco enjoyed legal protection of the COHIBA mark in Cuba prior to Respondent General Cigar's constructive first use date in the United States, and that General Cigar had knowledge of Cubatabaco's use of the mark in Cuba prior to filing its underlying applications. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Mark Rienzi maintains that at the oral argument this week in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:13 am
The complaint asserts that since Red Bull's introduction in 1996, over four billion units have been sold in the United States and over one billion dollars have been spent on advertising, marketing and promoting the Red Bull energy drink. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
Animal lovers will be relieved to hear that, despite Ron and Doby engaging in a little wrestling, the American Humane Association (AHA) stated in the film’s credits that:“No Animals Were Harmed In The Making Of This FilmTM”This post examines whether trade mark rights can be claimed in slogans and considers the AHA's prospects of success in registering this one in the United Kingdom or elsewhere in the European Union.Can trade mark rights be… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
United Fabricare Supply, Inc. v. 3Hanger Supply Company, Inc., 2012 WL 2449916 (C.D. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:30 am by Gene Quinn
Since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:30 am by Woodrow Pollack
 Id.The United States Supreme Court found such an intent in the Lanham Act inSteele v. [read post]