Search for: "White v. White"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 16,948
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2016, 2:40 am
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has excluded evidence obtained from the cellphone of the defendant in Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 3:27 am
There's nothing especially groundbreaking here legally speaking, a straight forward, fact intensive application of the Barker v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 9:41 am
L. 90-202), and reverse the Supreme Court's recent decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 8:22 am
We’ve written about it here and in a more in-depth review of the legal issues raised by the emergence of 3D printing in the medical device industry in our September 2015 white paper. 3D printing is in the news again thanks to the recent Federal Circuit ruling in ClearCorrect Operating LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 11:50 am
VIENNA — No one expected much progress from this past week’s diplomatic marathon to defuse the security crisis Russia has ignited in Eastern Europe by surrounding Ukraine on three sides with 100,000 troops and then, by the White House’s accounting, sending in saboteurs to create a pretext for invasion.But as the Biden administration and NATO conduct tabletop simulations about how the next few months could unfold, they are increasingly wary of another set of options for… [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 9:14 pm
” In Harrington v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 5:36 am
Supreme Court's decision last month in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 2:00 pm
In People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:25 am
(See Blank v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 9:19 am
CDW discussed the case in : An Eighth Circuit oddity: USA v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 2:36 pm
Loving last June, on the 40th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 6:25 am
President Barack Obama has selected White House Deputy Counsel Donald Verrilli Jr. to serve as Solicitor General. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:28 pm
Meyer v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:34 pm
Thanks to the Trump White House and Mitch McConnell’s Senate, there is now a 6-to-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court, vetted by conservative legal activists and committed to principles of constitutional interpretation that seem to require sweeping Roe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:32 am
(See Jonathan Haidt for a more complete explanation of conservative v. libertarian mindsets.)The Seattle Post-Intelligencer has a feature on Paul's stands on issues. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:54 am
The Special Task Force shall consist of the following members, or their designees:(i) the Attorney General, who shall serve as Co-Chair;(ii) the Secretary of Defense, who shall serve as Co-Chair;(iii) the Secretary of State;(iv) the Secretary of Homeland Security;(v) the Director of National Intelligence;(vi) the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency;(vii) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and(viii) other officers or full-time or permanent part-time… [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 5:30 am
Race-based restrictions on marriage have been illegal for, oh, 42 years now, since the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:22 am
More on the 1987 Supreme Court ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:33 am
In Granata v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 7:00 am
In Richmond v. [read post]
