Search for: "Akins v. State" Results 2261 - 2280 of 3,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm by Amber Walsh
The MDMA has further stated that unless the tax is repealed, it will “stifle innovation, harm patient care, and weaken the position of the United States as the global leader in medical device innovation. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:53 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Thus, the court says that it’s possible plaintiffs state a VPPA claim based on the disclosures to Facebook. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:44 am by Guest Author
Even if overdue fixes to the administrative state are finally made, some adjustments to our constitutional order should only come via amendment and, for those changes to occur, we will need to amend Article V. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 8:31 am by Robert Chesney
In some states capital charges are available in some circumstances. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm by Melina Padron
The Occupy Movement protests After legal action against the Occupy Movement protesters was suspended, Alex Aldridge, writing for the Guardian, considers whether the potential upcoming legal dispute will be akin to a David v Goliath battle. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 6:16 am by Jack Goldsmith
The Supreme Court has often affirmed, many times since United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 9:56 am by Lovechilde
They’re still miffed about women suffrage, the Civil Rights bill and Roe v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 1:09 pm
The decision is that of the ITAT Special Bench at Kolkata, in Shree Capital Services v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:20 am
  The attorney was charged with obstruction and making false statements related to a Food and Drug Administration investigation into drug promotions (United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
  This occurs despite Civil Code 1941.1 which clearly provides that the presence of vermin can render a unit untenable and decisions like Green v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:39 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The latter panel -- "Hell or High Water" Flooding & Takings Law -- focused on the issues in Arkansas Game & Fish Comm'n v. [read post]