Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 2261 - 2280 of 12,869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2015, 2:37 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Recently, New York courts have followed this lead and have held that a Florida choice-of-law provision in an employment non-solicitation covenant is unenforceable and contrary to New York public policy.The case is Brown & Brown, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm by Orin Kerr
Judge Sentelle wrote one dissent that was joined by Judges Henderson, Brown, and Kavanaugh, and Judge Kavanaugh wrote a second dissent. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 11:43 am by Eric S. Solotoff
  I noted then that it seemed that after the Appellate Division’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 7:02 am by Howard Bashman
And Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined. [read post]
14 May 2014, 3:16 am by Amy Howe
” With the sixtieth anniversary of the Court’s ruling in Brown v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
In a new Cato podcast, I talk with Caleb Brown about the Court’s pending case on “disparate impact” liability in housing and finance, Texas Dept. of Housing vs. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:06 am by Howard Bashman
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson delivered the opinion of the Court in Health and Hospital Corp. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:51 pm
Recommended: Ms Brown be transferred to a suitable location within 3 months Ms Brown be paid &po [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In Woodward v Grice [2017] EWHC 1292 (QB) the High Court considered the appropriate level of damages to award against a fan of the club for libellous statements made on an online forum. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
§ 30.1     Generally The Case: Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Matt Danzer
District Court for the District of Oregon issued an opinion this week in Latif v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:45 am by firstamendmentblogger
In today’s Washington Post, Robert Barnes looks at how the Court’s ruling in the violent video games case presents Justice Scalia’s and Justice Thomas’s sharply divergent views on what speech rights minors can claim under the First Amendment. [read post]