Search for: "Branch v. United States" Results 2261 - 2280 of 4,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
History and Foreign Affairs Backdrop Behind MPP An important point to note is that MPP returns non-Mexican asylum seekers present in the United States to wait in Mexico for the pendency of their U.S. immigration proceedings. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:45 pm by Tom Smith
Even the United States Secretary of State implied as much on his latest visit, expressing concern about the “core importance of democratic principles and institutions. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 1:33 pm
“Given the United States’ ongoing diplomatic efforts and the Executive Branch’s active consideration of how to effect [the Uighurs’] release, it is clear that [Secretary Gates] is not ‘ignoring’ this Court’s order, as [the Uighurs] contend. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Howard Friedman
The DOJ decision, which was approved by the President, comes in two suits against the United States filed in district courts in New York and Connecticut. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
  “International relations” was not a basis for distinguishing Bauman(which it refers to as “Daimler”):Daimler is binding precedent from the United States Supreme Court which this Court is bound to follow. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm by John Elwood
United States, 20-1410, and Kahn v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:16 pm by Courtney Minick
Appeals from there may be submitted to the Supreme Court of the United States, under seal. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 10:23 pm by Josh Blackman
Second, Roberts offers this account of the Bank of the United States debate and McCulloch v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:56 pm by Duncan Hollis
 These treaties, however, represent a clear counter-example to my claim; the U.K., Australia and the United States all expressly recorded their mutual understanding of how the United States would regard these treaties as a matter of domestic law. [read post]