Search for: "CASH v. UNITED STATES"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 2,412
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2008, 11:52 pm
Introduction An estimated 11.6 million unauthorized aliens [1] are currently in the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 11:36 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 5:03 am
The consequentialist version of imperfect procedural justice finds substantial support in the decisions of the Supreme Court that interpret the Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:29 am
------------------------"The United States incarcerates more people than any country in the world," said the Pew Center on the States, in a report released February 28, 2008, One in 100: Behind Bars In America 2008. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
On March 18, 2008, the New York Court of Appeals, which is New York's highest court, decided Appleton Acquisition, LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty)… [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 2:06 pm
It appears to be substantially the same as the original.Update: On April 17, 2008, the Court vacated its opinion and judgment sua sponte, explaining that an amended opinion will be filed forthwith.In United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are the two biggest home mortgage investing companies in the United States.[8] The two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) are privately-owned corporations authorized to make loans and loan guarantees.[9] The two giants operate in American's secondary mortgage market to ensure that mortgage bankers and other lenders have enough funds to lend to home buyers at lower rates.[10] The GSEs purchase… [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:41 pm
Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 12:46 am
On Wednesday, March 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:17 pm
[v] U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 12:04 pm
Degelmann, 29 F.3d 295, 300-01 (7th Cir. 1994); United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 5:18 am
In UNITED STATES v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 3:38 pm
First, by avoiding administrative proceedings altogether and commencing the action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the FTC avoids review by the 11th Circuit. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
US, No. 06-5301 Dismissal of claim for the return of cash that was seized and forfeited in connection with plaintiff's arrest for violating currency reporting laws is affirmed as the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the claim is barred by sovereign immunity. . .U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, February 27, 2008 U.S. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:40 am
Attempts to Regulate Payday Lenders Currently, garnishment of social security benefits is illegal and all active-duty military families are protected by the Military Lending Act signed into law on October 2006 - capping interest rates at 36% on all small loans, including payday loans, for all military families.[43] Small loans are governed by state law, and many states have implemented restrictions on payday lenders.[44] For example, many state have placed restrictions… [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:32 pm
" [34] Many observers forecast worry that the package will result in a "W" shaped, or double-dip, recession, where the aggregate demand will improve only temporarily and then decrease again. [35] V. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:08 am
See Swann v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 5:32 am
Connecticut and Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
In a recent 5-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
