Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 34,273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
IBC Business Owners for Sensible Development v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:55 am
In a 1992 Supreme Court decision, Dawson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:10 am
Glater is a professor of law at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am
Top marginal rates range from Arizona’s 2.5 percent to California’s 13.3 percent. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 11:39 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 10:12 am
Take, for instance, the case last year of Gene Poole Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
Google and Twitter Inc., v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 6:57 pm
Industries v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 11:51 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 3:03 pm
(California Court of Appeal, Feb. 9, 2023, Water for Citizens of Weed Cal. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
Republic of Germany v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 11:16 am
P’ship v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 11:02 am
Non-Exempt Classifications Under California Law. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
PetConnect Rescue, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:19 am
From McKenna v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:15 am
G Companies Mgmt., LLC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm
By now, the case is down to exclusive-dealing claims under California state laws. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 3:20 pm
But California allows the trial court to hold pleas in abeyance, which is what the trial court did, and after six months, when the plaintiff had completed the required community service and not violated any laws, the charges were dismissed in the interests of justice.Does that count as essentially a conviction and hence bar the civil suit? [read post]