Search for: "Corporations A, B, and C"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 7,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2016, 8:31 am
These include Rule 147 under Section 3(a)(11) (and soon the new Rule 147A), Section 4(a)(2) for "transactions by the issuer not involving a public offering", Regulation A, Section 4(a)(6) for the Regulation Crowdfunding offerings, and finally Rules 504, 505 (for a little while longer), 506(b) and 506(c) of Regulation D. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 7:43 am
Late 20th c. law firm associate folk art. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 10:50 am
Shulga is the co-founder of Ross & Shulga PLLC, a New York-based boutique law firm specializing in advising individual and corporate clients on aspects of corporate and securities law. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
F.R.C.P. 4(e)(2)(A)-(C). [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
Texamet Recycling, LLC, Judge Michael C. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 3:12 am
Lynch, Cynthia C.: Appointed to TTAB in 2015. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 10:49 am
§§ 981(a)(1)(C) and 982(a)(1) and (a)(2), and 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 12:13 pm
The FCC resolved the longstanding uncertainty on the use of the WCS 2.3 GHz band for terrestrial operations, prohibiting the use of portables and mobiles in the C and D Blocks directly adjacent to the satellite radio allocation and making the 20 MHz in the paired A and B blocks available for terrestrial mobile broadband operations. [read post]
19 May 2018, 2:38 pm
C. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 3:01 pm
C. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 6:16 pm
(described Ibid., ¶ 5(b)). [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 3:08 pm
B, which sells fish and seafood at the decedent’s Farms, and was owned by the decedent and brother A as equal shareholders; and (3) Corp C, which operates a meat market within the decedent’s Farms, owned wholly by decedent. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
(c) The term "tax" means those taxes referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) of Article I, as the context requires. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, February 26, 2021 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of February 19-25, 2021. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:25 pm
He predicted that the use of Rule 23(c)(4) issues classes is likely to be a focus in the future, and there is already a circuit split on whether the case as a whole must satisfy Rule 23(b)(3)’s predominance requirement if Rule 23(c)(4) is used. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Keith C. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Keith C. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 4:41 pm
Eisner: To survive a Rule 23.1 motion to dismiss in a due care case where an expert has advised the board in its decisionmaking process, the complaint must allege particularized facts (not conclusions) that, if proved, would show, for example, that: (a) the directors did not in fact rely on the expert; (b) their reliance was not in good faith; (c) they did not reasonably believe that the expert's advice was within the expert's professional competence; (d) the expert was… [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 7:30 am
These include: (a) Firms seeking board diversity are accessing an untapped talent pool; (b) Female and minority board members reduce agency costs; (c) A more diverse board possesses more and better information; (d) Diverse boards are more likely to engage in constructive dissent; and (e) A diverse board conveys a credible signal to relevant observers of corporate behavior. [read post]
23 Sep 2006, 2:09 pm
In addition to a the monetary penalty, after notice and opportunity for a hearing to any appraiser for whom a penalty had been assessed under Code Sec. 6701(a) the IRS could, under 31 USCS 330(c) : (a) bar the appraiser from presenting evidence or testimony in any administrative proceeding before IRS or the Treasury, and (b) provide that his or her appraisals wouldn't have any probative effect in any such proceeding. [read post]
