Search for: "D&S, Inc."
Results 2261 - 2280
of 26,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In conjunction with co-counsel, an Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging infringement by Sandoz Inc. of Princeton, New Jersey of ALIMTA®, Patent No. 7,772,209, which was issued by the U.S. [read post]
1 May 2007, 3:00 pm
Roadway Express, Inc. (7th Cir. 2007) __ F.2nd __, defendant Roadway Express, Inc. violated the FMLA (29 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:57 am
Gervais (D. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Oxy USA Inc., 2017 WL 3190354 (D. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
In order to meet his burden on his motion, respondent was required to provide documentary evidence that "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law" (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
In order to meet his burden on his motion, respondent was required to provide documentary evidence that "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law" (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
In order to meet his burden on his motion, respondent was required to provide documentary evidence that "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law" (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 2:36 am
Nautica Apparel, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
In order to meet his burden on his motion, respondent was required to provide documentary evidence that "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law" (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:15 am
Embassy Indus., Inc. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
In order to meet his burden on his motion, respondent was required to provide documentary evidence that "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law" (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
In order to meet his burden on his motion, respondent was required to provide documentary evidence that "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law" (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:32 am
The original (unsuccessful) challenge to the patent, owned by Myriad Genetics, Inc along with two co-patentees, was launched by cancer-survivor and ‘gene patent’ opponent Yvonne D’Arcy, along with advocacy group Cancer Voices Australia (which has since disbanded and withdrawn from the case). [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 8:04 am
Devita and Matter of Verizon New York, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 8:04 am
Devita and Matter of Verizon New York, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm
(d)(2) Sanction The court may impose an appropriate sanction-including the reasonable expenses and attorney's fees incurred by any party-on a person who impedes, delays or frustrates the fair examination of the deponent. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 10:56 pm
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. has filed an adversary complaint against Barclays Capital Inc. requesting the return of billions of dollars in extra profit that it says the latter made when buying Lehman’s North American brokerage business last year. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 5:49 pm
Supp. 2d 323, 349 n.19 (D. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 11:11 am
In Apollo Education Group Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:59 am
DC-17-16221-D. [read post]
