Search for: "Daniels v. State"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 4,978
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[Eugene Volokh] Interesting D.C. Circuit Dissent Regarding Computer Monitoring for Jan. 6 Trespasser
9 Aug 2024, 5:14 pm
Moreover, the First Amendment significantly limits the government's ability to prohibit speech that is false, United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:50 pm
The Court revisited the issue last year in Panetti v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:23 am
In Henderson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 1:32 pm
” State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 8:23 am
Ltd v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 3:54 pm
Authored by: Daniel L. [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:27 am
Daniel Lockaby, and Y. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:23 am
Energy United States, L.L.C., 720 F.3d 620 (5th Cir. 2013) Daniel Berman v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Still Eleonora writes about an error in the Italian translation of the directive spotted by Valentina Borgese, Carmine Di Benedetto, Daniele Cerulla and Daniele Fabris.IPR Carousel Kat friend Matthieu Dhenne discusses the Paris Court of Appeal's decision in Conversant v LG which provides an interesting discussion on essentiality and the application of the new French Trade Secrets Act. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
” It pointed to the Supreme Court’s statement in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:53 am
U.S. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
S. 378, 384 (1987);United States v. [read post]
Ind. Decisions - Yet more on: Impact of Fort Wayne Disability Center ruling in other areas of state?
5 Aug 2007, 3:54 pm
So did Charles Pride, office supervisor for the Indiana State Board of Accounts. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
John v St. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
” * Stormy Daniels v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:11 am
’” In an op-ed for The Hill, Richard Custin argues that the court should review Daniel v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:13 pm
State, Pickens v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 5:21 am
” In Slate, Daniel Politi reports that conservative politicians expressed outrage over the ruling. [read post]
