Search for: "Doctor v. State"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 8,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2011, 11:49 am
The attorney also provided a letter from the insured’s doctor stating that the person observed during surveillance in December 2007 was not the insured. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:03 pm
In Pryanishnikov v Russia ([2019] ECHR 614), a case concerning the authorities’ refusal to grant the applicant a film reproduction license, the European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the right to freedom of expression, as the only reason advanced by the domestic courts for the refusal of the relevant license had been based on mere suspicions rather than findings of fact. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:12 am
State Univ., 299 F.3d 1053, 1064 (9th Cir.2002).5 Fed.R.Evid. 702 (2010)6Barabin v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 7:01 am
Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 10:34 am
Dorsey v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
The Illinois Supreme Court during the 2010 case of LeBron v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
The Illinois Supreme Court during the 2010 case of LeBron v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
The Illinois Supreme Court during the 2010 case of LeBron v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm
See Daniel v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
For basically the exact same reasons as before; only, this time, with a doctor who gives more detail and says the necessary things. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
McChristian v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rees, Glossip v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:39 am
The law established by the United State Supreme court in Thomas v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:01 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals in Adkins v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 8:57 am
These damage caps, enacted by a 2003 overhaul of state law by then-Gov. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 8:57 am
These damage caps, enacted by a 2003 overhaul of state law by then-Gov. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 5:13 am
Herndon (1927), Nixon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 10:29 am
In areas of conflict, it is inevitable that more than a trivial percentage of local reporters will be partisans and that video footage will be designed or doctored to favor one side or the other. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:40 am
A November 16, 2017 decision, Norman v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:11 am
"An ALJ is required to state 'specific and legitimate' reasons to explain why his conclusions outweigh the doctor's opinion," the court stated. [read post]
