Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 4,619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2016, 5:30 am
For starters, I would certainly assign ##1, 2, 6, 14, 15, 17, 23, 37, 40, 41, 46, 49, and almost all of the essays on executive power, including the veto and the pardoning power. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 3:28 pm
” 41 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 3:24 pm
” 41 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
So, while the Division does investigateall verified complaints of discrimination filed with its offices, it is clear that many morecomplaints have been filed with third-party advocacy organizations.Among those who participated in the hearings were representatives of:• New Jersey State Bar Association• Garden State Equality16 (GSE)6• New Jersey Family Policy Council (NJFPC)• Lambda Legal17• American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey (ACLU-NJ)• Nati [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
Fontaine, President, Corporate Risk Holdings[1] take a look at these challenges and propose that in addressing their cybersecurity-related responsibilities boards should draw upon the same governance procedures they have longed used for with respect to financial accounting and reporting. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in New Doe Child #1 v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 pm
In so doing, the district court concluded that Warrant 2 violated Rule 41(b)(1). [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 9:16 pm
The standard shelter allowance does not cover actual fair rental values in the Nassau or Suffolk community. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
** Courts Are Inconsistently Grappling With the Question of Whether a Plaintiff Has Standing for an Injunction Prohibiting Misleading Behavior if They are Aware of the Behavior ** . . . [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
In these joined cases, the Court took the opportunity to re-write the penalties doctrine, which had not been considered by the House of Lords or Supreme Court since the 1914 case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
But, credit where credit is due, it does tend to make things stand out. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
¶ 1. . . . [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 12:41 am
The existence of multiple versions or adaptions does not affect the fact that ‘Le Journal d’Anne Frank’ is the unique and distinctive title of a specific book. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:30 pm
Clayton, 41 A.D.2d 204, 342 N.Y.S.2d 106 (Second Dept.1973). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:15 am
The case of SRMOF 2009-1 Trust v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 3:22 pm
What he was saying, quite correctly, was that the court should not “bring within the general words of a service charge clause anything which does not clearly belong there”. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:46 am
It does not strike me reading them, in the light of the judge’s rulings and his factual findings, that any of them involved an error of law. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
Doc. 115–1 at 9. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999) (quoting U.S. v. [read post]