Search for: "Does 1-54" Results 2261 - 2280 of 3,413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 9:43 pm
Question 4 was intended to act as a control to question 1, asking whether redress of a grievance had been attempted by any other means. 42 out of 77 (54%) reported yes, and 35 no. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:43 pm
Question 4 was intended to act as a control to question 1, asking whether redress of a grievance had been attempted by any other means. 42 out of 77 (54%) reported yes, and 35 no. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Which does not mean that they necessarily commit a substantial procedural violation when doing so.Inventive step[1] The Examining Division (ED) based its reasoning on the disclosure of, inter alia, document D4. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
The EBA, while being aware of the use of T258/03-Hitachi and T641/00-Comvik, stated circa May 2010: “We note, in passing, that it is somewhat surprising that the referral does not address any of its questions to the validity of this way of judging an inventive step, an issue which is surely of general interest (and one which Lord Justice Jacob proposed should be put to the Enlarged Board – “How should those elements of a claim that relate to excluded subject matter be… [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm
A 54 year old man was arrested in Laguna Niguel after being accused of assaulting the owner of the home where he was employed as a Gardner. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
The venue, as ever, is the quiet private room at Opus Restaurant, 54 Cornwall Street, Birmingham B3 2DE. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 4:39 pm by Mandelman
If you work as little as 1 hour, whether you collect a paycheck or not, you are considered employed. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:35 am by Bexis
  Plaintiffs can't use application of the rule to avoid having to prove their cases: While the learned intermediary doctrine shifts the manufacturer’s duty to warn the end user to the intermediary, it does not shift the plaintiff’s basic burden of proof. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 8:17 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
” People v Sandoval (1966) 65 C2d 303, 311 n5, 54 CR 123; Pen C §846. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:30 pm by Clay
Everyone seemed to regard me as a crack pot. " Why does a 54 year old man need to be out on a bike?" [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by Michael B. Stack
If given one more hour off between work shifts, over one-half of pilots (56%) and train operators (54%) report that they would use that hour for sleep. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by Michael B. Stack
If given one more hour off between work shifts, over one-half of pilots (56%) and train operators (54%) report that they would use that hour for sleep. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:55 pm by Michael Geist
Years ago, the Canadian Recording Industry Association would promote its annual sales data, but it no longer does. [read post]