Search for: "Fall v. State Bar" Results 2261 - 2280 of 4,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2020, 7:12 am by John Elwood
This will be a quick post this week because all the new relists fall into (barely) two categories. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am by Randy Barnett
S. 606 et seq.; United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 11:15 am by Amy Howe
It instructed the state to draw a new map with a second majority-Black district and barred the state from using the existing map. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:14 am by Lisa McElroy
The same kind of statutory interpretation issue arose in two of the other cases decided this week,  United States v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
  Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't  absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of  Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  Castle rebuffed a State’s attempt to bar a federally licensed motor carrier from its highways for past infringements of state safety regulations. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
This fall, state supreme courts in Michigan and Pennsylvania will hear cases challenging their states’ use of life without parole sentences. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 6:36 pm by Amy Howe
However, the bench that heard today’s oral argument in Howell v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 7:27 am by Xandra Kramer
This rule assigns jurisdiction to the courts of the country where the consumer resides whenever a trader directs commercial or professional activities to that Member State and the contract falls within the scope of such activities. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:45 pm by Amy Howe
The Maryland case went back to the lower court, which held a hearing last fall. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In other words, there is no bar to providing information pursuant to a FOIL request, or otherwise, that falls within one or more of the exceptions that the custodian could rely upon in denying a FOIL request, in whole or in part, for the information or records demanded. [read post]