Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 7,487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2017, 10:37 am
While the status of an employer’s obligation to accommodate marijuana usage for medical reasons under state law also appears to remain unchanged following Prop 64’s passage, the controlling California case on this issue, Ross v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Butterworth v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 12:03 pm
The court goes beyond the 4-factor Network Automation test and acknowledges the other factors, but it dismisses them: Proximity of Goods. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:31 pm
The Ninth Circuit remanded for a ruling on whether Pom Wonderful has standing on its California state-law claims against Coke. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am
The California Supreme Court denied review. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
These are the kinds of outcomes I wish we'd see across the country, not just in Texas and California and a few other states with reasonably strong anti-SLAPP laws. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:37 pm
California, 231 F.3d 572, 591 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 5:50 am
The base price is around $34,000, and a pair of recent decisions from California, Nevarez v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:55 pm
It's pretty good. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:53 am
The California state court judge repeatedly told the jurors to leave all their life experiences in a metaphorical "box" outside the jury room when they were deciding the case. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 5:13 am
When confronted, a doctor said "This is for his own good. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:03 pm
First, notice that the State actually prevailed below. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:14 pm
[Post by Venkat] Ferrington v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Arlington v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:30 am
In Ruiz v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:09 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:26 am
Entm’t 200, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm
Regents of University of California (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 160; Garrett v. [read post]
