Search for: "IN MATTER OF GRAY" Results 2261 - 2280 of 2,872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2010, 4:31 am by INFORRM
This is a paper which was given at the City University Forum on “Re-Framing Libel” on 4 November 2010. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:43 pm by Lisa McElroy
  He also explains that, no matter what level of scrutiny the Court applies to the law, he should win because the government has no legitimate basis for treating men differently than women. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 2:22 pm by lawmrh
It apparently didn’t matter to Woods that Judith Eiler had priors, having previously been called on the carpet for courtroom unprofessionalism. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 4:19 am by Maxwell Kennerly
There is, naturally, a big gray area when a lawyer is in this second situation. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:08 am by SHG
"Upon discovering that the two are brothers, the judge declared that the matter was a 'family affair' and that he intended to continue holding Tyrone L. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:41 am
Sir Charles Gray had held that the defendant sponsors had repudiated an agreement to sponsor the claimant’s Formula 1 team, by purporting to terminate it for breaches by the team. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:47 pm by Matthew Hill
This decision, made by Sir Charles Gray, referred to s.39(1)(a) of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:49 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
Gray Plant already blogs and is considering expanding its social media presence. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:22 pm by Ronda Muir
Ropes & Gray And here are the firms that should definitely be worrying about their future: 128. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  But the time it takes for a case to reach this stage varies substantially from 3 months (Ali v Associated Newspapers 2010 EWHC 100 (QB)) to 28 months (Kaschke v Gray 2010 EWHC 1907 (QB)) and it may well be that in many of the judgments in favour of the claimant, quantum remains in issue. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 10:56 am by Ronda Muir
Ropes & Gray And here are the firms that should definitely be worrying about their future: 128. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 9:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
 The matter was listed before him for a hearing, as it had been in the case of Gray a few days earlier. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Third, in Court 11, what appears to be a judge alone trial in the case of Wyatt v Cartwright, is listed before Sir Charles Gray. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:53 am by INFORRM
  The matter was listed before him for a hearing, as it had been in the case of Gray a few days earlier. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:37 am by INFORRM
Discusses whether the super injunction has had its day, following the Queen’s Bench Division rulings in DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB), AMM v HXW [2010] EWHC 2457 (QB) and Gray v UVW [2010] EWHC 2367 (QB)  in which anonymity orders, rather than super injunctions, were made. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:51 am by SHG
Matters so serious and complex as staying in the government's good graces can't be taught by just anyone. [read post]