Search for: "In Re Adoption of E"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 4,644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
It reasoned that because the SLC failed to meet the minimum requirements for adequate notice under Government Code section 11125(a), the SLC’s exhaustion defense was precluded under Public Resources Code section 21177(e). [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
The EU Commission adopted Decision 2000/520 pursuant to Art. 25(6). [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:43 pm
Annual E-Verify Bill. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
John Elwood reviews this week’s relisted cases. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:23 am
In re E.R. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
§895.047(1)(e); Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:29 am
Michael Geist holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:16 pm
Martin E. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:41 pm
A New York Divorce Lawyer said that CPLR 7804(e) directs that 'The body or officer shall file with the answer a certified transcript of the record of the proceedings under consideration, unless such a transcript has already been filed with the clerk of the court. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:16 pm
Lastly, the page of the website to which viewers are directed by the aired web address must not be used for e-commerce, advertising, or other commercial purposes. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
SCt adopted this reasoning. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
The records there show that Justice Hearn's husband, George, is a member of the parish's vestry and mission committee.All fine and dandy -- if a little too reminiscent of the case of Justice David E. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 12:02 pm
” The Ten Factor Test Ultimately, the HMS court was hesitant to adopt a “rigid and formulaic” rule regarding inadvertent e-filing, as there was no clear precedent governing the issue. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:27 pm
C. 1.16(e). [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:27 pm
C. 1.16(e). [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:58 am
Almost as soon as Congress adopts this law, it will be obsolete and inapplicable to the next technology. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 12:52 pm
This past April, Wyoming College of Law Professor Daniel E. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 7:53 am
I considered switching to an e-casebook version, but I found that the e-book was really just a pdf'd version of the book with a few hyperlinks and the publisher was still charging $180 for it. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
(Household),[3] as well as the author’s experience defending an issuer with a final, nonappealable verdict in its post-judgment claims process, which resulted in a settlement and the vacating of the fraud judgment.[4] Two categories of challenge remain following a nonappealable securities class judgment for plaintiffs: (i) rebutting the presumption of reliance that the Supreme Court adopted in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 5:19 am
The potential of transforming Parliament to an “e-Parliament” centres on three main areas: Increased administrative efficiency & effectiveness Improved information access and dissemination Enhanced interaction with citizens At the same time technology must be employed creatively; otherwise it merely becomes a more modern way of doing the work of the legislature, perhaps more efficiently but not necessarily more effectively. [read post]
