Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 5,434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2023, 9:18 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, to void any non-compete clause or agreement in an employment context, no matter how narrowly tailored, with limited exception. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:41 pm
Id. 10. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 2:06 pm
McCain, 974 F.3d 506 (Sept. 10, 2020). [read post]
Why Virginia will not be invited to the dance (the Supreme Court battle over the individual mandate)
17 Oct 2011, 8:15 pm
I believe there are three major reasons why Virginia pursued this matter separately.1. [read post]
2 May 2014, 7:46 am
If you are affronted by the payment of $44.4 million to Johnson for "a few hours work," here are some things that you should know: (1) the Amended Complaint referred to only about $10 million in payments (Op. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
An important breakthrough may emanate from the jurisprudential front; in its landmark ruling in Neubauer et al v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
¶ 1)Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on June 27, 2016, arguing that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on all three counts because no genuine issue of material fact exists. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 10:57 am
Most play by the rules and acquire land in appropriate locations. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:51 am
Amend. 7 [6] Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 38(a) [7] 54 A.L.R. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am
Specifically, managers face uncertainty regarding the application of the qualified custodian requirement under Rule 206(4)-2 (“Custody Rule”) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (“Advisers Act”). [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am
Specifically, managers face uncertainty regarding the application of the qualified custodian requirement under Rule 206(4)-2 (“Custody Rule”) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (“Advisers Act”). [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Inventive step[5] The decision under appeal starts from D1 and makes reference to passages on pages 1, 4 and 9. [5.1] On page 1, D1 introduces the problem of protecting ownership of digital data on the Internet. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 3:45 am
The trial of the consolidated matters commenced before Justice Bucaria on September 17, 2013. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 6:48 am
(a) USE OF THE ARMED FORCES AUTHORIZED.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 333 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: ‘‘§ 333. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
The amendment was ruled not germane. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:17 am
“HB 2127 reverses over 100 years of Texas constitutional law without amending the Constitution. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm
Walters, 20-1143Issue: Whether federal courts have subject-matter jurisdiction to confirm or vacate an arbitration award under Sections 9 and 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act when the only basis for jurisdiction is that the underlying dispute involved a federal question. [read post]
29 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Here is what I believe to be the fourth successful petition for review (after R 7/09, R 3/10 and R 21/11). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:47 am
Rule 12(b)(6). [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:28 am
Justice Ginsburg pointed out the different context of the 7th Amendment in Markman. [read post]
