Search for: "Jones v. State"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 6,828
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2016, 9:56 am
See Jauch v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:57 am
The result in this case can be contrasted with State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:32 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:02 pm
Jones v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:16 am
Go For It–Jones v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:35 am
Too bogus to fool the IRS, but real enough for conviction -- Murphy’s law is alive and well.United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 5:32 pm
Jones In Bello v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
Our next new relist is Jones v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 3:59 am
Coverage of yesterday’s ruling in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:37 pm
Jones v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 6:22 am
Jones. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:34 am
” At Townhall, Jonathan Wood weighs in on last week’s ruling in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:01 pm
The petition of the day is: Jones v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am
Texas, in which the Court will consider whether the state used the correct standard to determine whether death-row inmate Bobby James Moore is too intellectually disabled to be executed, as well as the grant in Buck v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
In the case of Adeniyi-Jones v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
Canada In the case of J.K. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Interestingly, both filed by Michael Heim’s firm with Miranda Jones on both briefs representing plaintiff-petitioners. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 4:24 am
Does Judge Jones skew toward the defense? [read post]