Search for: "Kat"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 6,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 3:41 pm
On 21 January fellow Kat Darren posted "No pain for Actavis - Warner-Lambert fail to stop launch of generic pregabalin" (here). [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
A Kat-pat to my personal IP-economics clipping service (a.k.a. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:34 pm
A couple of weeks ago this Kat had the enjoyable experience of attending a full-blooded debate, in the cosy comfort of London law firm Collyer Bristow's Gallery, on the motion "This House Believes That There Is No Sanction For Unreasonable Behaviour in the IPEC", IPEC being the acronym of the increasingly popular Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:56 pm
Earlier this week, this Kat wrote a post on the draft which is the result of the trilogue, pointing out that it bore the scars of apparently being hammered out as a compromise between opposed positions - presumably the Commission and the Parliament, judging by the previous drafts of the Regulation, as reported in this Kat's original piece on the subject. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:40 am
If YouTube and comparable platforms are regarded as content providers which compete with services such as Spotify, then Art. 3 InfoSoc should apply, but a new exception for small-scale content sharing for private purposes (for example for Kat videos) should be introduced; in addition, instruments such as extended collective licenses should be considered. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
Most of the Rules relate to this accreditation procedure, and have not, as far as this Kat can see, significantly changed from the previous draft (see IPKat post here), and the prescribed substantive content for the course has not altered (Rule 3). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
The regular round-ups will be brought to you by a variety of other Kats. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 12:55 pm
There is a new Kat on the blog…it’s me (see right)! [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:10 am
Book Review: Arnold reviews "Economic Approaches to Intellectual Property"This new book by Kat Dr Nicola Searle and Martin Brassell provides an introduction to the economics of intellectual property for lawyers, managers and policymakers. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:20 am
This Kat hopes that the rules are speedily changed to make it possible. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:35 am
Like her bayou cat cousins, had the AmeriKat been in New Orleans, she would be preparing herself for some jambalaya and beignets, adorning herself with Mardi Gras beads and avoiding any cameras associated with Kats Gone Wild (for cultural reference, see here). [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 10:25 am
There will be conference reports coming in the next few days from a team of wonderful Kat contributors. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:24 pm
Kat readers who have been to Paris surely remember the numerous shops selling musical boxes. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 6:06 am
How a civil suit will play out is not entirely clear to this Kat, who has always understood that a rabbinical court proceeding is a type of arbitration. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:37 pm
A review will follow on this weblog in due course, once this Kat has a copy of the book between his paws. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 2:32 am
Incidental inclusion of Kats or notFactsPhilippe Cuny, a sculptor specialising in mirrors and lighting, created the "Lyre" lamp. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 10:38 am
Every now and then, the IPKat team welcomes new contributors, says thanks and goodbye to existing contributors, and shares some news concerning the Kats. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 9:26 am
This Kat recognizes that the entry of GE as a manufacture of 3D printers does not necessarily create a zero-sum game; both the Stratasys’s and the GE’s of the world may well be engaged in non-competing markets for 3D printing devices. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 2:06 am
Kat horoscopeHappy New Year to all IPKat readers! [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:46 am
Both Kats wonder if this is another of those areas of overlap between trade marks and other IP rights in which the careful attention of the courts may have to repair any possible damage done by insufficiently precise legislation in the first place.The UK government will be pleased if you get in touch with the UK Intellectual Property Office to tell them what you think, so that they can get involved if necessary. [read post]
