Search for: "Levi v Levi" Results 2261 - 2280 of 3,414
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2011, 11:56 pm by Fiona de Londras
This allows for the imposition of the pension levy on judges (the former Attorney General had felt the levy could not be imposed, although there is divided views on this). [read post]
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
In addition, the appellate court concurred in the analysis found in Buetz v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Marie Louise
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
However, the Supreme Court had never drawn such a distinction, according to the franchisor, and had long held that there be a substantial nexus between a state and an out-of state business before any tax could be levied. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:10 am by Howard Knopf
    Let’s take a few more months, listen to the Supreme Court of Canada (which brought us the landmark CCH v. [read post]