Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am
As mentioned above, on Thursday 20 June 2024 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) handed down a unanimous judgment in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Styen J handed down judgement in the case of Prospect v Evans [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB). [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am
Section 32 was criticised as by amongst others Lord Lester, at the time that the Data Protection Bill was being considered, for not properly importing the test of “objective necessity” required by the Directive (see also our posts here and here). [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am
Section 32 was criticised as by amongst others Lord Lester, at the time that the Data Protection Bill was being considered, for not properly importing the test of “objective necessity” required by the Directive (see also our posts here and here). [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am
Section 32 was criticised as by amongst others Lord Lester, at the time that the Data Protection Bill was being considered, for not properly importing the test of “objective necessity” required by the Directive (see also our posts here and here). [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:58 pm
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v Hassan Abdi and Afrah Khalaf [2010] EWHC 3083 (Admin) The Court of Appeal decided that time spent appealing against deportation counts in assessing whether an individual has been detained for an unreasonably long period. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:50 am
And indeed he is not the only person: Lord Hoffmann and Laws LJ are very much on a footing with Sumption here. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The LSC argued it was, citing R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 and, of course, Weaver v London Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 235 (our report here). [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
Statements in Open Court and Apologies Media interest in privacy injunctions was revived with Imogen Thomas’ statement in open court in the case of CTB v NGN, which stated the claimant footballer had accepted there was no basis to accuse her of blackmail. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
United States Ryan Larson, the man c [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm
United States Summer Zervos’ defamation claim [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:06 am
The procedure Lord Justice Munby, giving the leading judgment, was highly critical of the way in which the City Council had made the first disclosures. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm
This reflects the current law as stated in Chase v News Group Newspapers ([2002] EWCA Civ 1772). [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
Lord Roger, with whom Lord Walker and Lord Collins agreed, was also content to ground his understanding of persecution in a right that does expressly exist within international human rights law. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
In Loving v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
She also noted [at 50] that in Comic Enterprises Ltd v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 11:00 pm
Morley & Ors, R. v [2010] EW Misc 9 (EWCC) (11 June 2010) – Read judgment Four former Members of Parliament have failed in their initial bid to claim parliamentary privilege in criminal proceedings arising from the parliamentary expenses scandal. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:53 pm
“If James Watt made more law than Lord Coke,” says the author in a moment of unwarranted exhilaration, “then the Wright Brothers outdid James Watt” (p. v); it is hardly convincing proof of this to find the cases on air law referring to such old friends as Gibbons v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 12:16 am
– Judith Townend Case Law: CTB v News Group Newspapers: privacy law and the judiciary – Edward Craven Privacy law: the super-injunction is dead Case Law: Mosley v United Kingdom: pre-notification rejected by Strasbourg – Hugh Tomlinson QC Case Law: Goodwin v NGN – Privacy, Intrusion and Novelty – Mark Thomson Case Law: Thornton v Telegraph Media Group, an offer of amends defence fails – Hugh Tomlinson QC Finally, we remind… [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 3:21 pm
" Truax v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Sighted this morning, breaking the surface just off the Strand, the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in MedImmune v Novartis [2011] EWHC 1669 (Pat) certainly fits the legend.In characteristic style, the judgment is as comprehensive as one would wish. [read post]
