Search for: "Mark May"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 64,935
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2015, 2:41 am
In re Packed House Publications, LLC, Serial No. 85955911 (May 13, 2015) [not precedential]. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 3:11 am
" Furthermore, both marks may be called for by consumers "as a perfume container in the shape of a male torso. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Just ask Mark Cuban. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:30 am
They have some interesting thoughts on non-traditional trade marks and the impact of the recent EU trade mark reforms. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
A second potential conflict of interest may haunt the department as well. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:00 am
Mandalia v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7 May 2015. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 9:05 am
But the company's plans may be foiled. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:00 pm
’” And a court may presume materiality for literally false statements. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:09 am
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins issued the following statement over the weekend: CHIEF PROSECUTOR MARK MARTINS REMARKS AT GUANTANAMO BAY 28 MAY 2016 Good evening. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
CIPO may require applicants to comply with the new Nice requirements contained in the amended Act—and it appears more likely that CIPO may impose this obligation upon this class of applications, whether contemporaneously with allowance of the application, or as a pre-condition to registration. [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:35 am
In re Friedman and Wieder Enterprises Inc., Serial No. 87612654 (May 6, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:22 pm
Mark D. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:18 am
"The Ninth Circuit correctly held that whether two marks may be tacked for purposes of determining priority is a question for the jury. [read post]
24 May 2024, 4:59 am
In re Rise Above, Serial No. 88735273 (May 13, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 7:59 am
The sentence originally read as follows: Section 14 lists numerous bases on which a third party may seek Board cancellation of a registered mark, including likelihood of confusion, abandonment, dilution, deceptiveness, and if the mark is merely descriptive or has become generic or functional. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:56 am
Filed under: America Invents Act, False Marking, Intellectual Property Litigation, Patent Reform Act of 2011, Patents Tagged: America Invents Act, Federal Circuit, patent, patent false marking, patent litigation, Pittsburgh patent lawyers [read post]
10 May 2007, 9:20 am
Mark-up is expected on May 17, 2007. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:29 pm
This is the high water mark of the summer. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:46 pm
Some of you may enjoy this (of course, others may not): Spell Checker Poem I have a spelling checker, It came with my pea see; It plainly marks four my revue Mistakes I cannot sea. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:56 pm
Governor Mark Dayton signed the enabling legislation on Tuesday, May 14, 2013 after the bill easily passed the Minnesota House by a vote of 75-59. [read post]
